Study Gasparri!! "
House and Senate have different legislatures (respectively 5 and 6 years) and to perform melted together with the elections, the Chamber of Deputies. For this reason, in 1963, have equated the term of the two chambers. 2) Dissolution for political reasons and to save the government is not there ever been:
dissolve the House because that would express an opinion differing from that of the government this would be a punishment for dissent (but we know that Berlusconi Like little dissent). Not to mention that our bicameral is equal: the basis on which to dissolve the chamber expressing legitimately dissent?
3) The dissolution of a single room can only be because that camera is not working properly:
institutional life would be damaged. In this case we want to pursue different objectives. And if you vote again, the House Berlusconi loses? It would have greater diversity and then re-awaken the problem. It should dissolve at this point, but both the rooms and you would have to vote twice in a few months. But even if the majority were homogeneous, they would vote for the Senate in 2013 and for the Chamber of Deputies in 2015: it will go back to point 1; then again in 2013 should dissolve the Chamber of Deputies.
4) As far as I can say Berlusconi, who is the President of the Republic dissolves the Chambers.
consultations certainly are a very wise constitutional practice, but did not decide which room dissolve Berlusconi, Berlusconi decides whether to vote: first to dissolve the rooms, the President of the Republic should consider whether it is possible to find another majority terms the legislature and only after this step should be to empty it will go to the polls. why I find inappropriate, as well (and that) Berlusconi, pseudodirigenti all those politicians who do not even know they speak.
Gasparri stuuuuudiaaaaaa!
dissolve the House because that would express an opinion differing from that of the government this would be a punishment for dissent (but we know that Berlusconi Like little dissent). Not to mention that our bicameral is equal: the basis on which to dissolve the chamber expressing legitimately dissent?
3) The dissolution of a single room can only be because that camera is not working properly:
institutional life would be damaged. In this case we want to pursue different objectives. And if you vote again, the House Berlusconi loses? It would have greater diversity and then re-awaken the problem. It should dissolve at this point, but both the rooms and you would have to vote twice in a few months. But even if the majority were homogeneous, they would vote for the Senate in 2013 and for the Chamber of Deputies in 2015: it will go back to point 1; then again in 2013 should dissolve the Chamber of Deputies.
4) As far as I can say Berlusconi, who is the President of the Republic dissolves the Chambers.
consultations certainly are a very wise constitutional practice, but did not decide which room dissolve Berlusconi, Berlusconi decides whether to vote: first to dissolve the rooms, the President of the Republic should consider whether it is possible to find another majority terms the legislature and only after this step should be to empty it will go to the polls. why I find inappropriate, as well (and that) Berlusconi, pseudodirigenti all those politicians who do not even know they speak.
Gasparri stuuuuudiaaaaaa!
Alessandro Picaron
0 comments:
Post a Comment